(6.1.6.6)
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Kitty is Back
Collapse
X
-
StreamFab.log doesn't seem to point to a DRM problem, but one never knows. It does list an OVP_00311 error. Peacock Help doesn't list that error or what it means.
First started not downloading for me with (test version) 6.1.6.6 and continues with (release version) 6.1.6.6. All download attempts were for new TV releases (6AM ET, 02/22/24).
<Days of Our Lives, Chicago Fire, Chicago PD>
I will go back now and try downloading an old video or two. I'll report back, next message.
StreamFab.log
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Cats4U View PostStreamFab.log doesn't seem to point to a DRM problem, but one never knows. It does list an OVP_00311 error. Peacock Help doesn't list that error or what it means.
First started not downloading for me with (test version) 6.1.6.6 and continues with (release version) 6.1.6.6. All download attempts were for new TV releases (6AM ET, 02/22/24).
<Days of Our Lives, Chicago Fire, Chicago PD>
I will go back now and try downloading an old video or two. I'll report back, next message.
[ATTACH]n437947[/ATTACH]
- Likes 1
Comment
-
As all the freeware gets larger, Stream Fab gets larger, their only responsibility is to put all that freeware together in a way that works. It doesn't seem they can do that. Maybe if they gave some credit to the real developers of these programs, they would get help from them. As a developer myself, I would never use someone else's code and not even mention them in my release notes. They make money from someone else's work and don't even mention them with a thank you. Very sad.Programmer in Python, Java, JavaScript, Swift, PHP, SQL, C#, C++, Go, R
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chameleon View PostAs all the freeware gets larger, Stream Fab gets larger, their only responsibility is to put all that freeware together in a way that works. It doesn't seem they can do that. Maybe if they gave some credit to the real developers of these programs, they would get help from them. As a developer myself, I would never use someone else's code and not even mention them in my release notes. They make money from someone else's work and don't even mention them with a thank you. Very sad.Last edited by wyhtmgm; 02-23-2024, 03:08 PM. Reason: Edited to clarify I mean the developers of the freeware, not the developers of Streamfab
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by wyhtmgm View Post
I wonder if the developers of the freeware want to be associated with this type of app that can easily be misused.Programmer in Python, Java, JavaScript, Swift, PHP, SQL, C#, C++, Go, R
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sebastian001 View Post
So, PYthon37, YoutubeToMP3Service, YoutubeToMP3Process, mkvmerge are identical in version... As a non-expert, I can't see anything else
And that's why I said that I didn't want to go any deeper because I really don't look at what the Developers put in there because I immediately switch a lot of them out. I'd do even more if the versions weren't hard-coded in the source code in a few of them. Take YoutubeToMP3Process as an example, it basically is yt-dlp with two additional parameters added. One is for a StreamFab cache function, and I forget what the other is for. You can't just rename the latest yt-dlp.exe to YoutubeToMP3Process.exe. You'll get an exception error. They say that YoutubeToMP3Process is the latest yt-dlp, but it basically is the latest stable yt-dlp, which can be months old compared to the latest nightly. So many times I've seen someone have a problem with SF caused by an old yt-dlp extractor which would be fixed if YoutubeToMP3Process used the nightly instead of the stable.
- Likes 4
Comment
Comment