It turned out perfect as far as I can tell. But this is not a regular "movie studio" thing, it's a help video my business partner put together to help me learn the finer qualities of one of our products. So any flaws that are in it could also be in the original file. But at first glance it looks pretty good, and the process that I used to make the DVD is good.
After my last post in this thread (for timmymac123), I remembered that I had actually done that before. I have a DVD called Joe Bonamassa: Live From The Royal Albert Hall, which is an over two hour long show that according to Amazon.com is "a twelve-camera high definition, surround sound shoot" on two DVD's. The resolution of the video is 1920x1080.
When I made a copy to watch and keep the original in mint condition, I made an .ISO of each disk and burned them both onto one disk in the manner I described in my last post. I was shocked (and very pleased) to see that the video looked as good as the original. Someone with a better eye for video quality might disagree on that assumption, but I think it looks great. :)