SF patcher

    @Wilson.Wang Wilson, I think you need to look into this. I absolutely hate crackers. If I have to pay big money for a program, they should, too.

    4 days later

    I take comfort in knowing ID10Ts who utilize cracks sooner or later stick their d*cks in the proverbial meat grinder. It's inevitable they wind up with "free software" they hadn't planned on and when they have to send a hefty chunk of bitcoin to some .onion site in Russia to unlock their encrypted data there will be no tears from me.

    @Wilson.Wang Wilson, I think you need to look into this. I absolutely hate crackers. If I have to pay big money for a program, they should, too.

    Cats4U


    They call that an injector, and there isn't a damn thing anyone can do about it. Sure, they can block the injector, but the developers can work around that in 3 seconds. I don't think Fab is going to court in the USA to have that program shut down. Being in China is a good thing sometimes, but being in China can also work against you.

    there isn't a damn thing anyone can do about it. Sure, they can block the injector

    Chameleon

    First of all, SF should be able to recognize the files from Patcher in SF program dir:

    lpk.dll, msimg32.dll, PYG64.dll, version.dll, uxtheme.dll + winmm.dll


    Wouldn't it be helpful to compare email addresses with incoming payments?


    First of all, SF should be able to recognize the files from Patcher in SF program dir:

    lpk.dll, msimg32.dll, PYG64.dll, version.dll, uxtheme.dll + winmm.dll


    Wouldn't it be helpful to compare email addresses with incoming payments?

    Germania


    Yes, but that is a tough job. But it would work. Someone would have to monitor the program matching the e-mail addresses, assuming someone wrote a program with every e-mail address that has ever bought Stream Fab.



    Yes, but that is a tough job. But it would work. Someone would have to monitor the program matching the e-mail addresses, assuming someone wrote a program with every e-mail address that has ever bought Stream Fab.

    Chameleon


    It seems that this is somewhat already in operation. That's why the patchers have already come up with bypasses to error codes 318, 319, and 320. StreamFab just needs to refine their algorithms or dedicate someone to manually do the search. When I was moderator and had access to reading the streamfab.logs, I saw many examples of users that were obviously using illegal versions of StreamFab and passed them on to the staff. Hey, it's DVDFab's money to lose, so it is up to them to tighten up their security. For a libel finder's fee and the needed access, I'd be willing to manually do the searching. As a retired person, living on Social Security, just barely pays the bill each month. I'll increase StreamFab's security during my many free hours for the right price and the guarantee that I won't be ignored this time. How about it, @Wilson.Wang?

    Hi,

    Thanks for the infomation, the dev is working for a new solution.

    Wilson


    Thanks for the infomation, the dev is working for a new solution.

    Wilson.Wang


    I guess that's a No then. Shame. Now the developer has to work on trying to fight piracy, which will take him away from fixing StreamFab download problems. Plus, I could have used the money. ;)



    I guess that's a No then. Shame. Now the developer has to work on trying to fight piracy, which will take him away from fixing StreamFab download problems. Plus, I could have used the money. ;)

    Cats4U


    it seams that the program is already broken, there's an article on their discord saying the cracked version of streamfab has been blocked.



    it seams that the program is already broken, there's an article on their discord saying the cracked version of streamfab has been blocked.

    october262


    Not entirely. It still works for many users with only minor disruptions.


    Thanks for the infomation, the dev is working for a new solution.

    Wilson.Wang


    @Wilson.Wang, there has been a lot of confusion lately concerning users receiving error codes in the three hundred range (3xx). Could you please provide us with a list of these error codes and what they mean within StreamFab? While you are at it, could you do the same for other error codes that StreamFab users commonly see? This will go a long way toward helping users of this forum to troubleshoot problems without getting you or the developers involved. It would be best if this list was made into a closed "sticky" so we have easy access to it. Closed, so that no one could add their comments to it.



    @Wilson.Wang, there has been a lot of confusion lately concerning users receiving error codes in the three hundred range (3xx). Could you please provide us with a list of these error codes and what they mean within StreamFab? While you are at it, could you do the same for other error codes that StreamFab users commonly see? This will go a long way toward helping users of this forum to troubleshoot problems without getting you or the developers involved. It would be best if this list was made into a closed "sticky" so we have easy access to it. Closed, so that no one could add their comments to it.

    Cats4U




    This should work as a somewhat complete list lol.



    @Wilson.Wang, there has been a lot of confusion lately concerning users receiving error codes in the three hundred range (3xx). Could you please provide us with a list of these error codes and what they mean within StreamFab? While you are at it, could you do the same for other error codes that StreamFab users commonly see? This will go a long way toward helping users of this forum to troubleshoot problems without getting you or the developers involved. It would be best if this list was made into a closed "sticky" so we have easy access to it. Closed, so that no one could add their comments to it.

    Cats4U


    @Cats4U I guess he specifically posted it for you

    @Wilson.Wang These people are illegally using streamfab cached keys vault api. I think you should do what he suggests and add server side checks at least now.

    Oh no! Not the activator! Glad we could help out with error codes though :)