Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

StreamFab 6.2.1.1 is suddenly unable to access a specific website.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    StreamFab for Windows StreamFab 6.2.1.1 is suddenly unable to access a specific website.

    StreamFab 6.2.1.1 is suddenly unable to access a specific website.

    The website was working fine until yesterday and can still be accessed without issues using a regular browser.
    However, it suddenly cannot be accessed through StreamFab 6.2.1.1. On another computer with StreamFab 6.2.0.5,
    the website works without any problems.

    What could be the cause of this issue, and how can it be resolved?

    I have tried updating the Chrome browser, but it didn’t fix the problem.



    #2
    "And when I close the tab while unable to access the website, the StreamFab program shuts down completely."

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by cloud5858c View Post
      .. 6.2.1.1. On another computer with StreamFab 6.2.0.5 ..
      What could be the cause of this issue ..
      I have tried updating the Chrome browser​
      The browser in SF is the same for all SF versions for 6202 or newer

      Your regular Chrome browser has no effect for SF own Browser ..
      .. SF use its own Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF)


      > is suddenly unable to access a specific website
      > The website was working fine until yesterday

      SF will not have changed itself overnight ..
      .. something may have changed on the site or on your PC.

      I cannot say or guess more as long as the “specific website” is unknown​

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Germania View Post
        The browser in SF is the same for all SF versions for 6202 or newer

        Your regular Chrome browser has no effect for SF own Browser ..
        .. SF use its own Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF)


        > is suddenly unable to access a specific website
        > The website was working fine until yesterday


        SF will not have changed itself overnight ..
        .. something may have changed on the site or on your PC.

        I cannot say or guess more as long as the “specific website” is unknown​
        thank you..
        but...​

        It seems that there might be a difference in browser functionality between versions 6.2.0.5 and 6.2.1.1 of SF. When I uninstall 6.2.1.1 and install 6.2.0.5, I can access a website that I couldn’t access before. However, if I reinstall 6.2.1.1, I am unable to access the same site again. I believe this issue is clearly related to the built-in browser in version 6.2.1.1.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by cloud5858c View Post
          I believe this issue is clearly related to the built-in browser in version 6.2.1.1.
          I did not claim that there are no differences in the SF versions ..
          .. but the Browser engine is unchanged - both use CEF (libcefbase.dll) 128.4.8.0
          only the used user-agent info is different.

          But 6205 have QT WebEngine (Qt5WebChannel.dll+Qt5WebView.dll) and 6211 does not have it
          Otherwise of course the QCef.exe is different (info)​

          Comment


            #6
            Why won't you just name the website? Nobody cares what you are watching/downloading. We don't know you IRL. In fact, we don't even know you online...

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Germania View Post

              Your regular Chrome browser has no effect for SF own Browser ..
              .. SF use its own Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF)

              And yet when trying to download using Youtube movies SF asks me to log in on my own browser then close it rather than logging on on the SF browser

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by phelings View Post
                And yet when trying to download using Youtube movies SF asks me to log in
                on my own browser then close it rather than logging on on the SF browser
                That's why both browsers are independent of each other ..
                .. otherwise this request (for the import of stored YT cookie) would not be necessary at all.​

                Comment

                Working...
                X