I'm asking this because I read it somewhere, but I'm not sure if it's true. The guy basically said that a 3D movie in 2D has half the resolution horizontally, which doesn't make sense. I have a ton of 3D ISOs that were ripped by DVDFab, and, upon doing this, I got rid of my 2D rips of the same movies from prior to doing this since having both a 2D MKV and 3D iso of the same movie would be redundant, and the 3D ISO should give a better picture while in 2D because of it being uncompressed.
3D blu-ray ISOs, by nature, should be playing in full-SBS, which is two 1920x1080 pictures to make a full 3840x1080 picture, not two 960x1080 pictures for a 1920x1080 picture, which is what half-sbs is. If this is true, then why would a 3D ISO play in half resolution when it could just take one of the 1920x1080p pictures or flatten the image? Can anyone answer this for me? Does this guy know what he's talking about, or is he mistaken?
Do 3D movies in 2D play in half the resolution, or is it still full resolution like (I think) it should be? Thanks.
3D blu-ray ISOs, by nature, should be playing in full-SBS, which is two 1920x1080 pictures to make a full 3840x1080 picture, not two 960x1080 pictures for a 1920x1080 picture, which is what half-sbs is. If this is true, then why would a 3D ISO play in half resolution when it could just take one of the 1920x1080p pictures or flatten the image? Can anyone answer this for me? Does this guy know what he's talking about, or is he mistaken?
Do 3D movies in 2D play in half the resolution, or is it still full resolution like (I think) it should be? Thanks.
Comment