Hello all.
I have been doing some test to see how speed and file size change when using either software or Quick Sync Encoding. Surprised with the results and confused.
The conversions using Quick Sync take half the time to encode, that's okay, but the files are much smaller? That I don't understand. Example. Using a bluray ISO image. Encoding to H264 1280 x 720 With AC3 audio
Desktop computer running Xeon E31280. All encoding settings on software. Lightning recode and shrink off. Using a CRF value of 17. End file size 3.32gb
Same settings on laptop with i7 3517u. All settings using quick sync with lightning recode and shrink on. Using CRF value of 17. End file size 2.53gb
Did the same test again using a CRF value of 16. Software only was 4.83gb vs Quicksync and lightning version 2.95gb
Why are the Quicksync versions smaller in size. The video quality looks just the same?
I have been doing some test to see how speed and file size change when using either software or Quick Sync Encoding. Surprised with the results and confused.
The conversions using Quick Sync take half the time to encode, that's okay, but the files are much smaller? That I don't understand. Example. Using a bluray ISO image. Encoding to H264 1280 x 720 With AC3 audio
Desktop computer running Xeon E31280. All encoding settings on software. Lightning recode and shrink off. Using a CRF value of 17. End file size 3.32gb
Same settings on laptop with i7 3517u. All settings using quick sync with lightning recode and shrink on. Using CRF value of 17. End file size 2.53gb
Did the same test again using a CRF value of 16. Software only was 4.83gb vs Quicksync and lightning version 2.95gb
Why are the Quicksync versions smaller in size. The video quality looks just the same?
Comment