From the discussions on my request for advice to transfer to HDD and playback from HDD, I feel it might be appropriate to create a separate thread on ISO v. Folder related discussions.
Given my limited knowledge and experience, it seems (i) the file sizes for both are the same, (ii) both can be played back without any video or audio loss, and (iii) both can be reverted to normal DVDs and BDs, if so desired at a later day.
However, a Folder, although complicated and cumbersome, can be played back using (i) PowerDVD on a PC and (ii) a media player on a TV. To me, if I am not wrong, an ISO can only be played back through a media player, but cannot be played back on a PC. Therefore, a Folder is more versatile than ISO. Am I right?
Furthermore, I suppose I can re-name a folder without jeopardizing the playabilty or the burnabilty of the folder, because sometimes, the BD makers misnamed the title. But, can you name or re-name an ISO? I don't know.
I am sure that I might have overlooked the other Pros and Cons and would therefore appreciate your input ans support.
Given my limited knowledge and experience, it seems (i) the file sizes for both are the same, (ii) both can be played back without any video or audio loss, and (iii) both can be reverted to normal DVDs and BDs, if so desired at a later day.
However, a Folder, although complicated and cumbersome, can be played back using (i) PowerDVD on a PC and (ii) a media player on a TV. To me, if I am not wrong, an ISO can only be played back through a media player, but cannot be played back on a PC. Therefore, a Folder is more versatile than ISO. Am I right?
Furthermore, I suppose I can re-name a folder without jeopardizing the playabilty or the burnabilty of the folder, because sometimes, the BD makers misnamed the title. But, can you name or re-name an ISO? I don't know.
I am sure that I might have overlooked the other Pros and Cons and would therefore appreciate your input ans support.
Comment