I am a previous user of DVDFab on a much older XP based OS platform, so with great expectation I was hoping to see some serious performance improvements under my new Win64 Professional platform. Just for some background, I have just completed a new system build consisting of an Asus P8Z68 Deluxe Mother Board, with a Intel i7 2600K processor (mildly over clocked to 4.5 GHz) and 16GB of DDR3 RAM. This system also has a combination of a SSD (Crucial M4 256GB) for the OS and a 2 GB RAID (Two 1 GB Western Digital RE4's) for storage. Finally, I am using a mid-range Nvida based GPU, the GTS450 OC, since I am not a gamer. Anticipating several questions relating to running that "latest drivers, yes I am; both software and firmware. It is a brand new system and I spent hours in ensuring the latest drivers were loaded. Needless to say this system is very powerful and fast.... unless testing under v8.1.1.7.
Here are my observations:
This particular MB supports QuickSync via D-mode only, so under the Lucid Virtu control panel I added two "applications", fabcore.exe and dvdfab.exe, which is how other QuickSync application (like Media Expresso) needs to recognized under D-mode. I know this setup is working since DVDFab "allows" me to select QuickSync for both decode and encode.
So I decided to test the performance of this brand new system using my daughter's personally owned Blu-ray movie Rango in a test scenario of a Blu-ray "Full-Disk" copy to BD25. Before I started I created an .ISO file of the original Rango movie onto to my RAID (about 27GB) and I am then using this ISO file as source to the Full Disk" copy with target being yet another folder on my RAID to eventually burn, via ImgBurn, as a BD25 Blu-ray.
Before starting this process, I went into DVDFab's "Settings / A/V Codec" to ensure that Decoding H.264 and MPEG2 was set QuickSync (Vc1 was set to Cuda). For the Encoder, I set that QuickSync as well. My logic was every codec that takes advantage of QuickSync will be used.
Now the performance; I am averaging less than 2.0 MB/s as indicated on DVDFab's status bar. This also translated to an estimated run time of over 5 hours! I believe DVDFab is sending the encoding requests to the iGPU, since DVDFab's running log states "Intel GPU acceleration for video decoding enabled". BTW, my Fabcore.exe is only using about 5 to 8 % CPU (not even all cores), but I would expect this, since the iGpu should be taking much of the load from the 2600K CPU But this observed performance can not be the "norm", can it?
Frankly, my 6 year old XP based system with a old Intel P4 processor and 2 GB of Ram can do the same (using software for decode/encode) in about 16-18 hours, yet my current system is on a (computational) order of being 25x times faster, yet only 3x faster for this Blu-ray exercise.
So, I have given you my system specification(s). What has been your DVDFab development benchmark tests using Quicksync? I am not bragging, but I can't believe you benchmarked this on a faster i7 2600K system.
And I am not ready to clobber my Blu-ray decoding by using just my raw 2600K (over clocked) CPU power, since you do advertise Qucksync's speed / elegance / quality.
I also suggest you create Quicksync primer; specifically and more importantly officially telling us Z68 owners what arethe optimal A/V Codec parameters for DVDFab under this new Intel technology. So far, in reading the forum on this topic it is hit and miss. And frankly you can't get a more "clean" system than mine.... As DVDFab was the first application I have installed beyond the OS and Imgburn. So there is no other application "pollution" occurring on this setup......
OK... I'm open for suggestions / tips from other Z68 owners (particularly running in D-mode). And of course I am awaiting an official response from the technical folks at DVDFab.
Thanks all,
Ken
Here are my observations:
This particular MB supports QuickSync via D-mode only, so under the Lucid Virtu control panel I added two "applications", fabcore.exe and dvdfab.exe, which is how other QuickSync application (like Media Expresso) needs to recognized under D-mode. I know this setup is working since DVDFab "allows" me to select QuickSync for both decode and encode.
So I decided to test the performance of this brand new system using my daughter's personally owned Blu-ray movie Rango in a test scenario of a Blu-ray "Full-Disk" copy to BD25. Before I started I created an .ISO file of the original Rango movie onto to my RAID (about 27GB) and I am then using this ISO file as source to the Full Disk" copy with target being yet another folder on my RAID to eventually burn, via ImgBurn, as a BD25 Blu-ray.
Before starting this process, I went into DVDFab's "Settings / A/V Codec" to ensure that Decoding H.264 and MPEG2 was set QuickSync (Vc1 was set to Cuda). For the Encoder, I set that QuickSync as well. My logic was every codec that takes advantage of QuickSync will be used.
Now the performance; I am averaging less than 2.0 MB/s as indicated on DVDFab's status bar. This also translated to an estimated run time of over 5 hours! I believe DVDFab is sending the encoding requests to the iGPU, since DVDFab's running log states "Intel GPU acceleration for video decoding enabled". BTW, my Fabcore.exe is only using about 5 to 8 % CPU (not even all cores), but I would expect this, since the iGpu should be taking much of the load from the 2600K CPU But this observed performance can not be the "norm", can it?
Frankly, my 6 year old XP based system with a old Intel P4 processor and 2 GB of Ram can do the same (using software for decode/encode) in about 16-18 hours, yet my current system is on a (computational) order of being 25x times faster, yet only 3x faster for this Blu-ray exercise.
So, I have given you my system specification(s). What has been your DVDFab development benchmark tests using Quicksync? I am not bragging, but I can't believe you benchmarked this on a faster i7 2600K system.
And I am not ready to clobber my Blu-ray decoding by using just my raw 2600K (over clocked) CPU power, since you do advertise Qucksync's speed / elegance / quality.
I also suggest you create Quicksync primer; specifically and more importantly officially telling us Z68 owners what arethe optimal A/V Codec parameters for DVDFab under this new Intel technology. So far, in reading the forum on this topic it is hit and miss. And frankly you can't get a more "clean" system than mine.... As DVDFab was the first application I have installed beyond the OS and Imgburn. So there is no other application "pollution" occurring on this setup......
OK... I'm open for suggestions / tips from other Z68 owners (particularly running in D-mode). And of course I am awaiting an official response from the technical folks at DVDFab.
Thanks all,
Ken
Comment