What's da fastest anyone has ever read/burned complete movie (as .iso or any copy method) to bd-r?
I have a brand new, supposedly very fast, 12x from Lite-On (iHBS212-08) which saves (flawlessly) 40+ GB .iso's in @45 minutes. However, using latest v.8.1.9.6, compressing/copying straight from disc, and burning to single layer bd25 takes about 15 hours. No trans-coding, just a simple copy.
I loaded .iso into fab, after reading someones thread suggestion a few days ago, didn't help-still 15 hrs.
If task 1 of 2 during a session takes basically 15 minutes in an .iso rip/read, why does same task take six hours in copy mode (even with slight compression)? Is the compression scheme/algorithm wound too tight?
I don't think the media is an issue either. I'm using 6x verbatims. None of the bd-r media out there is faster than 6x/8x anyway so why burners are up to 14x now is beyond me.
I was going to try ImgBurn but I don't have any dual layers so I'm going to have to compress one of my current.iso's and re-save it later today.
I have a brand new, supposedly very fast, 12x from Lite-On (iHBS212-08) which saves (flawlessly) 40+ GB .iso's in @45 minutes. However, using latest v.8.1.9.6, compressing/copying straight from disc, and burning to single layer bd25 takes about 15 hours. No trans-coding, just a simple copy.
I loaded .iso into fab, after reading someones thread suggestion a few days ago, didn't help-still 15 hrs.
If task 1 of 2 during a session takes basically 15 minutes in an .iso rip/read, why does same task take six hours in copy mode (even with slight compression)? Is the compression scheme/algorithm wound too tight?
I don't think the media is an issue either. I'm using 6x verbatims. None of the bd-r media out there is faster than 6x/8x anyway so why burners are up to 14x now is beyond me.
I was going to try ImgBurn but I don't have any dual layers so I'm going to have to compress one of my current.iso's and re-save it later today.
Comment