Title says it all.
I'm curious as to why many of you Copy a movie to your hard drive as an .iso then Rip that .iso to your preferred format, ie .MKV.
I've heard someone mention they do it to save wear on the DVD drive. I don't quite get that since you have to read from the DVD drive either way, whether you read during the Rip or the Copy.
It also takes twice as long to get to your desired format.
I can Rip a 2hr movie to my desired format in 11 mins, but if I Copy to my hard drive then Rip that to my desired format it takes 24 mins for the same 2hr movie.
I've been a DVDFab user for almost 10 years and never even thought to Copy then Rip. I've done this process just to see if anything was different, but don't really see a benefit.
Thoughts?
I'm curious as to why many of you Copy a movie to your hard drive as an .iso then Rip that .iso to your preferred format, ie .MKV.
I've heard someone mention they do it to save wear on the DVD drive. I don't quite get that since you have to read from the DVD drive either way, whether you read during the Rip or the Copy.
It also takes twice as long to get to your desired format.
I can Rip a 2hr movie to my desired format in 11 mins, but if I Copy to my hard drive then Rip that to my desired format it takes 24 mins for the same 2hr movie.
I've been a DVDFab user for almost 10 years and never even thought to Copy then Rip. I've done this process just to see if anything was different, but don't really see a benefit.
Thoughts?
Comment