Problem with GTX260 and enabling CUDA decode/encode

[EVT]

What speed are you getting with Cuda encoding disabled?

For blu-ray copy it depends on the size and I'm having trouble recalling an exact number but I've been doing a few MKV's lately with the blu-ray ripper module and I seem to get about 35 fps. With blu-ray copy I would say that it usually takes between 75 and 100 minutes to compress the movie only to 8968 MB.

[ernielee]

For blu-ray copy it depends on the size and I'm having trouble recalling an exact number but I've been doing a few MKV's lately with the blu-ray ripper module and I seem to get about 35 fps. With blu-ray copy I would say that it usually takes between 75 and 100 minutes to compress the movie only to 8968 MB.

just backup underworld a 133 minutes movie only BD25
with setting cuda encode / decode software , fast/normal
avg speed are 6.25MB/s 70min to compress.
your time of 75,100 minutes are good and fast.
35 fps are good too.

[EVT]

just backup underworld a 133 minutes movie only BD25
with setting cuda encode / decode software , fast/normal
avg speed are 6.25MB/s 70min to compress.
your time of 75,100 minutes are good and fast.
35 fps are good too.

To be honest with you, the speed of DVDFab is in my opinion it's best quality. However, having read that a few on here are able to utilize the Cuda Encoder and Decoder successfully I figured I would do my best to maximize the program's capabilities. While you're times seem similar, you must bear in mind that you're using the slow setting while I'm using the fast setting.

Do you find that you're able with your profile that you successfully can compress VC1 movies since your using CUDA for both encoding and decoding? Perhaps I should consider CoreAVC, at least that way I can get a boost for most movies since greater than 2/3 of my movie collection utilizes AVC.

[ernielee]

To be honest with you, the speed of DVDFab is in my opinion it's best quality. However, having read that a few on here are able to utilize the Cuda Encoder and Decoder successfully I figured I would do my best to maximize the program's capabilities. While you're times seem similar, you must bear in mind that you're using the slow setting while I'm using the fast setting.

Do you find that you're able with your profile that you successfully can compress VC1 movies since your using CUDA for both encoding and decoding? Perhaps I should consider CoreAVC, at least that way I can get a boost for most movies since greater than 2/3 of my movie collection utilizes AVC.

yes I can successfully compress VC1 movies.
BTW underworld setting was FAST/normal.
if I use SLOW/high quality it is about 1MB/s slower to compress.

[EVT]

yes I can successfully compress VC1 movies.
BTW underworld setting was FAST/normal.
if I use SLOW/high quality it is about 1MB/s slower to compress.

So in your opinion, has Core Avc made a positive difference?

[ernielee]

So in your opinion, has Core Avc made a positive difference?

well if you want speed w v8.0.0.5 cuda decode,cuda encode is way
faster for my set up CoreAVC is running about avg 1MB/s slower
but with my setting I have been able to backup 100% of my BD.
Very happy with dvdfab and both of my vidoe cards, GTX275 and GTS250.
Quality on all my backups are great watching on a 60" LG w/5.1 surronnd sound.

[EVT]

well if you want speed w v8.0.0.5 cuda decode,cuda encode is way
faster for my set up CoreAVC is running about avg 1MB/s slower
but with my setting I have been able to backup 100% of my BD.
Very happy with dvdfab and both of my vidoe cards, GTX275 and GTS250.
Quality on all my backups are great watching on a 60" LG w/5.1 surronnd sound.

I realize CUDA encode is faster but I was wondering whether you noticed any appreciable improvement in speed using Core AVC relative to just the software option. The only reason I even started this thread is because I'm unable to get CUDA encoding to work. BTW, that's quite the PC.

[ernielee]

in the past coreavc was about .75 to 1MB/s faster with v7.x.x.x
It is nice to have coreavc in my pc as an option.
If you are able to get over 5MB/s when compression in any setting
to that is great.My old pc compression main movie only BD25 was
1.2 to 1.80MB/s 5+ hours.

[EVT]

in the past coreavc was about .75 to 1MB/s faster with v7.x.x.x
It is nice to have coreavc in my pc as an option.
If you are able to get over 5MB/s when compression in any setting
to that is great.My old pc compression main movie only BD25 was
1.2 to 1.80MB/s 5+ hours.

Thanks for the very precise info, it's much appreciated.

[srb01]

I don't notice a big difference in speed from COREAVC and CUDA. What I notice is the CUDA processed movie is better quailty, less intermitent glitches and pixelations. Speed both COREAVC and CUDA run between 5 and 7 mb/s.
On a side note: Process speed will increase substantialy if you have/use two harddrives. Read from one, and write to another.
but if you can't get CUDA working, COREAVC is only $12, give it a try.
Stu