The Competition

[NewMelle]

I beg to differ. StreamFab was direct downloading like there was no tomorrow last year. We have one screen recorder already so no need for another.

Guys,

He's

Not

Getting

It.



I'm not pissed in the least. You'd KNOW it if I were pissed. What I can't abide is BS. Most of us have already paid in full for a damn screen recorder why on earth would we want to buy another just like it? The last thing I want to see is someone buying into that only to find out they already bought the same thing to begin with. If it's not an improvement like AS it doesn't bear mentioning.

[artsunlimited]

Kigo works just like StreamFab did last year. But ok. If you say so. I gain absolutely nothing from people who decide to purchase Kigo.

To your eye, maybe - but as SF has been a direct downloader right up until 1/25/24 and KigoSoft itself makes it very clear it isn't a direct downloader, they didn't resemble each other in terms of being screen recorders until after the CDM revocation in January. That's why everyone here is so irate - we paid for a direct downloader, not a cobbled-together screen recorder/re-encoder that still doesn't function as anything for several major modules.

No one thinks that you gain anything or get a commission from Kigo purchases. Your impression and experience is your own, so if you tell people you personally can't tell the difference between Kigo's screen-recorder and SF as a direct downloader before the DRM shakeup, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it, and we'll either accept it or reject it depending on how credible we think you are as an informed source.

But if you're going to tell people about a product, then you also have a responsibility not to misinform them by misrepresenting what it does. It's also OK to say that you don't know.

[jpp72]

https://filecr.com/search/?q=Kigo&id=044003330000